At longer focal lengths, the 1"-type sensor facilitates background blur reminiscent of larger professional cinema cameras, enabling dramatic compositions without sacrificing versatility found in a compact, handheld form factor. Whether producing event or ENG-style videos, or even a short film, the 20x optical zoom power of the lens starts from a wide 24mm equivalent FOV for shooting in tight spots or grabbing impressive establishing shots, and it extends out to 480mm-equivalent FOV for getting in tight on far-away subjects. Featuring a large 1"-type 4K sensor, the HC-X1 is capable of recording video in DCI (4096 x 2160) as well as UHD (3840 x 2160) 4K resolutions. It is exactly the same as Matthew and same camera.Bring your video productions into the world of 4K with the Panasonic HC-X1 Ultra HD 4K Professional Camcorder. Question Can you use a camcorder Microphone without a same brand (or any) camcorder? Question Video with Panasonic g9 + 12-60 2.8 -4 leica lens 4k 60fps Solved! Panasonic NV-DS29 MiniDV camcorder LCD issue
Solved! How to connect Panasonic TZ40 to laptop Sure!īut will they still think a7SII is a superior camera than GH5? Https /You are right when you wrote: everyone has a different opinion. Https /https /https /http /I think they don't like neither a rallenty of a 60p because it is irrelevant for some people: There are also some videos where GH5 can compete or even it is better than 20.000 US$ cameras. Then I don't understand why some guys love stroboscopic movement of the videos with 25p cameras. Look as some video on youtube of a7SII vs GH5.
Did you even a visual comparison between GH5 and a full frame camera? As long as people are content to see stroboscopic images in 25p even in expensive cameras like Sony a7SII and they doesn't even notice the stroboscopic movement of the things or the people in the video, it is needless talking on the forums.įor example the a7SII isn't superior to GH5. You are very good in theory and know a lot in the world of cameras but the practice is different. I use a Nikon full frame for photos and a Sony rx10 and Panasonic gh3 for video. The older gh3 and gh4 are also still great. It is comparatively easy to learn and easy to use. It has very good support in video accessories. Generally those who should go that route. I am not recommending a full frame for video. Full frame cameras, particularly those from Nikon and Canon have the best lens selections especially at the high end.
Poor optics = poor results no matter what the sensor. Less noise.įinally there is lens selection. A larger sensor has more photons hitting it.
For example her eye is in sharp focus and then the scene behind her gradually swims in to focus without losing focus on her. A full frame camera can achieve shallower depth of field. These more variations in color, more details in shadows and more details in the brightest areas where on a smaller sensor (or older full frame) there would be nothing. To most it won't matter.Ī full frame camera has considerably better dynamic range. There are still things a full-frame can do that a m4/3 can't. And while good video AF speed won't matter to experts, it matters to 99% of the people buying these things.įor those 99% the gh5 is probably the best video/still hybrid.
The GH5 also has good auto-focus in video (the guys using full-frame use follow-focus devices for smooth manual focus even if the camera has good video AF). The GH5 has the advantage of longer than 29minute videos. With "VIDEO" not "PHOTOS" it is harder to see the difference in many ways. If you and not another guy, put two cameras (GH5 and a full frame camera) on one same tripod and you make a UHD video, which video of both is better? Wich has a better image quality? Ohhhhhhh, why do you make that question so difficult? It is so easy to reply if you if you know the world, Therefore I reformulate the question differently: